Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Shaw's avatar

This is a valuable angle. I think I will update my Substack intro to "This writing is not free. You have to comment to avoid charges. Any feedback whether negative, informative, positive or corrective is welcome. Say something or you get a bill."

Expand full comment
Barbara at Projectkin's avatar

I've been thinking about coming up with a metaphor that describes each of us as not researching a family history book but instead toiling to compile and provide order to a family history archive. We then use that archive (and the inherent meaning and structure we've built into it) to tell stories in a variety of projects.

Projects could be scholarly books, but they don't have to be. They may slip in bits of opinion, conjecture, and myth, but they're labeled as such. That's where the easy and fun comes in. It also makes it easier to recruit family to share what they know. Sourced, these recollections add to the archive with color, context, and insight.

The archive becomes the inheritance and the added projects are the left behind color and additions each of us make to the archive. None of us really owns the archive, we're merely guardians, curators, archivists. The care of thoughtful genealogists are like advanced mathematicians and engineers making sure the stated facts in the archive are on a solid footing.

Ya think?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts